Epistemic Violence and the Exclusion of Subaltern Voices from the Academy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15353/chuj.v1i1.7302Abstract
When scholars of colour articulate ideas about knowledge and power, their words are often quoted poetically and celebrated for their experiential wisdom. Yet, these same insights are rarely engaged as rigorous theory in the humanities and social sciences. Instead, white scholars frequently translate these ideas into what is deemed “accessible” academic language, building careers on ideas originally developed by scholars of colour. This process constitutes epistemic theft, a form of structural extraction embedded in academic knowledge production and dissemination (Manuel & Derrickson, 2015).
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Simran Mukkar, Sukhmani Mukkar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.