The Kirpan: Justified Doctrine or Just a Dagger?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15353/lsuj.v1i0.119Abstract
This paper will synthesize the Multani argument under section 2a of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (1982) and explain the significance of the Kirpan before progressing to synthesize the Commission scolaire Marguerite-Bourgeoys’ argument under section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (1982). The paper will also lay out a preliminary understanding of section 88(1) of the Criminal Code of Canada as it explains the definition of a weapon in relation to section 267 of the Criminal Code of Canada, the crime of assault as related to the Commission scolaire Marguerite-Bourgeoys’ argument. The paper will then close by summarizing the Supreme Court of Canada’s judgement on the matter.Downloads
Published
2016-10-24
Issue
Section
Articles
License
All authors have referenced and footnoted all ideas, words, and/or other intellectual property from other sources used in the completion of the essays. All authors have included a proper reference list, which includes acknowledgement of all sources used to complete the paper. The essays within this journal shall not be reproduced in any form without permission of the publisher or the author, and shall also not be resubmitted in any way for use in any academic setting.Â