Predicting the risk for angle closure as defined by the Shaffer System Using Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography: A Simple Approach

Authors

  • Dan Samaha, OD, MSc École d’optométrie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec
  • Sébastien Gagné, MD, FRSC Institut de l’œil des Laurentides, Boisbriand, Québec
  • Marie-Eve Corbeil, OD, MSc École d’optométrie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec
  • Pierre Forcier, OD, MSc École d’optométrie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15353/cjo.v82i1.1591

Keywords:

: anterior chamber angle imaging, ASOCT, glaucoma, laser peripheral iridotomy, optical coherence tomography

Abstract

Purpose: To propose a simple non-invasive method for screening patients at risk for angle closure using anterior segment OCT. Methods: Scans of nasal and temporal iridocorneal angles in glaucoma suspect patients were performed using OCT. Upon identifying Schwalbe’s line, the integrated caliper tool was used to draw a line to the nearest point of the iris to produce a measure ‘S-I’. Gonioscopy was performed and angles graded according to Shaffer’s classification to assess the correlation between both methods. Results: Thirty-four images were available for analysis. Spearman correlation coefficients between S-I anf gonioscopy grades were 0.81 for nasal and 0.77 for temporal quadrants respectively. Intraobserver ICC calculations demonstrated excellent reproducibility (0.98 and 0.99 for nasal and temporal angles) and excellent interobserver correlation (0.94 and 0.93). The diagnostic cutoff value of S-I for occludable angles was established at 330mm.

Conclusion: S-I measurement strongly correlates with gonioscopy and may be a suitable alternative for evaluating risk for angle closure.

Downloads

Published

2020-02-21

How to Cite

Samaha, D., Gagné, S., Corbeil, M.-E., & Forcier, P. (2020). Predicting the risk for angle closure as defined by the Shaffer System Using Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography: A Simple Approach. Canadian Journal of Optometry, 82(1), 100–105. https://doi.org/10.15353/cjo.v82i1.1591